Brexit Delivered

Home / Myths

Myth-busting

Brexit myths, checked against the facts

Each claim is answered with published figures from the IMF, ONS, HM Treasury and Eurostat.

Myth-busting

Ten things you often hear, checked

Each claim below is answered with published figures. Open any one to see the evidence and where it comes from.

Claim 1"There are no Brexit benefits."

The biggest benefit is that Britain left

The aim of Brexit was to leave the EU and take Britain's decisions in Britain again. That has happened. Parliament is supreme, UK courts have the final say, and every law can be changed by people the public elects and can remove.

Everything else follows from that. The freedoms listed here are what independence looks like in practice, and Britain would have none of them had it stayed.

See a selection of 50 Brexit benefits, each dated and sourced

  • The last word on law. Since 1 January 2024 EU law no longer overrides Acts of Parliament, and the EU's court no longer rules on Great Britain.
  • £12.6bn down to £0.7bn. What Britain paid the EU, net, in 2020 and in 2025.
  • No share of €807bn of EU debt. The EU's joint borrowing since 2020 is being repaid by its members until 2058. Britain owes none of it.
  • Control of the border. Free movement ended on 1 January 2021. Parliament now decides who can come to live and work here.
  • Britain's own trade deals. India, Australia, New Zealand and the 12-nation Pacific partnership, plus a 10% US tariff on British cars against 15% on EU cars.
  • And the economy kept growing. The UK economy grew 17.1% over 2021–2025, faster than Germany (4.5%), France (13.8%) and Italy (16.7%).

Sources: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023; HM Treasury; House of Commons Library; European Commission; Department for Business and Trade; IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2026.

Claim 2"Brexit has been an economic failure."

Not what the growth figures show

Since the transition period ended, the UK economy has grown faster in total than Germany, France or Italy, using the IMF's own figures.

Forecasters such as the OBR assume a long-run productivity cost of about 4%. That is a modelling assumption about a world that did not happen. It cannot be measured directly, and the whole of Europe's big-four economies have had a hard decade.

  • Real GDP growth 2021–2025 (IMF): UK 17.1%, Italy 16.7%, France 13.8%, Germany 4.5%.
  • In 2025 the UK grew 1.3%, faster than France (0.9%), Italy (0.5%) and Germany (0.2%).
  • By Q2 2026 UK GDP was 6.3% above its pre-pandemic peak; Germany's was 1.9% above.

Sources: IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2026, Table A2; House of Commons Library, GDP international comparisons (Sept 2026); OBR. See Growth for caveats.

Claim 3"Rejoining would bring back growth."

There is no growth engine to plug back into

The EU's largest economy, Germany, has barely grown since 2019. The IMF expects Germany, France and Italy to grow between 0.5% and 0.9% in 2026.

Re-entry would also take years, cost the UK its current trade deals, and come on worse terms than before (see The Rejoin Reality).

  • Germany's GDP in 2025 was only about 0.2% above 2019 (IMF).
  • IMF 2026 projections: UK 0.8%, Germany 0.8%, France 0.9%, Italy 0.5%.
  • Membership would end independent UK deals such as CPTPP, because trade policy is an exclusive EU competence.

Sources: IMF WEO April 2026; Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, Article 3(1)(e).

Claim 4"Brexit caused the cost-of-living crisis."

EU members were hit just as hard

The price shock of 2022 was driven by energy costs after Russia invaded Ukraine. It hit countries inside the EU as hard as the UK, and in several cases harder.

Some studies find extra border checks added to food prices. But EU membership did not protect the Netherlands, Italy or Germany from inflation at or above UK levels.

  • UK inflation peaked at 11.1% (October 2022).
  • Eurozone average peak: 10.6% (October 2022).
  • Germany 11.6%, Italy 12.6%, Netherlands 17.1% at their 2022 peaks.

Sources: ONS consumer price inflation; Eurostat harmonised index of consumer prices (HICP).

Claim 5"Sovereignty was never lost, so nothing has changed."

UK courts once set aside Acts of Parliament

Under the European Communities Act 1972, EU law took priority over UK law. In the Factortame case (1990), UK courts disapplied part of an Act of Parliament because it conflicted with EU law.

That can no longer happen. EU law's supremacy in UK law was abolished from 1 January 2024.

  • European Communities Act 1972 repealed by the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
  • The European Court of Justice's jurisdiction over Great Britain ended on 31 December 2020.
  • Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023, section 3: the principle of EU law supremacy no longer applies.

Sources: R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p Factortame (No 2) [1991] 1 AC 603; legislation.gov.uk.

Claim 6"The £350m a week for the NHS never arrived."

The NHS got far more

The health budget for England has risen from £120bn in 2016/17 to £204.7bn in 2024/25. That is an extra £1.6bn every week, more than four times the figure on the bus.

In fairness on both sides: the £350m was a gross figure that ignored the rebate, and the statistics watchdog criticised it. And the extra NHS money came from tax and borrowing as well as from EU payments that stopped, so it cannot be traced pound for pound.

  • Health spending per week: about £2.3bn in 2016/17, about £3.9bn in 2024/25.
  • After inflation, health spending grew by 3.1% a year on average between 2015/16 and 2023/24.
  • In June 2018 the government announced £20bn a year more for the NHS by 2023/24, worth £384m a week in real terms, funded "in part" from money no longer sent to the EU.

Sources: The King's Fund; House of Commons Library, NHS funding and expenditure; Prime Minister's Office, June 2018; UK Statistics Authority.

Claim 7"Leaving the EU's Dublin rules caused the small boats."

The crossings began while Britain was still in

The Dublin rules let a country send an asylum seeker back to the first EU country they reached. Small-boat crossings started in 2018 and rose 28-fold by 2020, all while the UK was still covered by those rules.

Dublin returned very few people. From 2016 the UK took in more asylum seekers under it than it sent back. Research on why people choose Britain points to the English language, family already here and how often claims succeed. Oxford's Migration Observatory notes that many asylum seekers have limited information about the policies of the country they are heading for.

  • Small-boat arrivals: 299 in 2018, 1,843 in 2019 and 8,462 in 2020, the UK's last year under Dublin.
  • Later years: 28,526 in 2021, 45,755 in 2022, 36,816 in 2024 and 41,472 in 2025.
  • In 2020 the UK sent 105 people to EU countries under Dublin and received 882. Fewer than 1 in 10 UK requests succeeded after 2016.
  • Across 2008 to 2020 the UK transferred an average of about 560 people a year.

Sources: Home Office irregular migration statistics; House of Commons Library; Migration Observatory, University of Oxford. The phrase "Farage boats" was used by the then Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, in autumn 2025.

Claim 8"Brexit has cost Britain 4% of GDP, or even 8%."

Those are model estimates, not measurements

Nobody can observe the Britain that stayed in the EU. Every figure for the "cost of Brexit" compares the real economy with an invented one, and the answer depends on how that invented Britain is built.

In fairness: most economists think leaving has had some cost, and the official forecaster says its assumption is broadly on track. But the largest figures rest on the weakest comparisons, and the economy's actual record is better than any of them implied.

  • The 4%. This is an assumption the Office for Budget Responsibility set in March 2020, averaged from outside studies written before the trade deal was agreed. It calls the range of estimates "wide" and expects the effect to take 15 years. Britain Unbound notes that 9 of the 13 studies behind it put the cost below 4%.
  • The 8%. A 2025 American study compared the UK with a group of other countries and blamed the whole gap on Brexit. That cannot separate Brexit from the pandemic, the energy shock or America's spending boom.
  • The "doppelgänger" 5.5%. Almost a third of that comparison was the United States. UK growth tracked Germany's both before and after 2016.
  • What can be measured. Since 2016 the UK has grown about 1% less in total than its European peers. Since 2021 it has outgrown Germany, France and Italy.
  • A critic's own figure. Professor Jonathan Portes, of UK in a Changing Europe, puts the cost at 2% to 3% and calls that "a subjective assessment, not a quantitative model".

See all six figures, where each comes from and what is wrong with it

Sources: Britain Unbound, "Brexit loss of GDP predictions" (May 2026); OBR, "The effect on productivity of leaving the EU" (March 2020) and March 2023 update; Julian Jessop, "Debunking the dodgy stats" (May 2026); Gudgin and Lu, UK in a Changing Europe working paper 05/2023; Jonathan Portes, UK in a Changing Europe; IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2026.

Claim 9"Leaving the EU means turning our back on Europe."

The EU is not Europe

Europe is a continent of more than 40 countries. The EU is a political union of 27 of them. Britain left the union. It did not leave the continent, and it cannot.

Good relations with neighbours do not need a shared government. Norway, Switzerland and Iceland are European, prosperous and outside the EU. Britain works with its neighbours every day on defence, trade, science and security, as an independent country.

  • Defence. The UK is a leading member of NATO, which defends Europe, and one of Ukraine's biggest backers.
  • Europe's wider clubs. The UK belongs to the 46-nation Council of Europe, the European Political Community and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
  • New treaties with neighbours. A friendship treaty with Germany was signed in July 2025, alongside long-standing defence treaties with France.
  • With the EU itself. Tariff-free, quota-free trade under the 2020 trade agreement, a security and defence partnership agreed in May 2025, and membership of the Horizon science programme since 2024.

Sources: House of Lords Library, "UK and Europe: cultural, diplomatic and security relations"; UK–EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement; Council of the EU.

Claim 10"Wanting control of immigration is racist."

Controlling a border is what every country does

Almost every country in the world decides who may come to live and work there. So does the EU, which has its own border force and has set aside €5bn for migration and border management in 2026. Debating the numbers and the rules is ordinary democratic politics.

Since 2021 Britain has applied one set of rules to people from every country. Inside the EU it had to give Europeans priority over everyone else. Racism exists and should be condemned wherever it appears. It is a separate question from how many people a country admits and on what terms.

  • Why people voted Leave. 49% said their main reason was that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK. 33% said control of immigration and borders.
  • Who voted Leave. A third of Asian voters and more than a quarter of black voters backed Leave (33% and 27%).
  • One of the most welcoming countries. In a 2022 study of 17 countries Britain was the most accepting of immigration. 31% wanted strict limits or a ban, against 35% in Germany and 39% in Canada.
  • Still true today. Oxford's Migration Observatory says opinion has become less supportive recently, but the UK is still more positive than many of its European neighbours.

Sources: Lord Ashcroft Polls, June 2016; World Values Survey, Policy Institute at King's College London (2022); Migration Observatory, University of Oxford; Council of the EU, 2026 budget.

The numbers, decoded

Six figures you will hear, and where they come from

Claims about the cost of Brexit are often quoted side by side as if they were established facts, even when they contradict each other. Each one comes from a different source and a different method.

The figureWhere it comes fromWhat is wrong with it
"A 4% hit to productivity" (or to GDP)An assumption made by the Office for Budget Responsibility before the UK left. It is an average of outside studies, not the OBR's own analysis.The studies were written before the exit deal was known and used a mix of models. Nine of the 13 put the cost below 4%. The OBR itself calls the range "wide" and expects the effect to take 15 years.
"15% less trade"Another OBR assumption, drawn from outside studies of UK–EU trade.The OBR applied it to all UK trade in goods and services with the whole world, not just goods sold to the EU. Critics say a fall of that size has not appeared. The OBR says its assumption is broadly on track.
"£100 billion a year"Bloomberg Economics, January 2023. At the time £100bn was about 4% of GDP, so it is often confused with the OBR figure.It assumed the UK would otherwise have tracked the other G7 economies exactly as it did before 2016. That counts the pandemic, the energy crisis and everything else as Brexit. It is also more than three years old.
"2.2% of GDP", or "£25 billion", from a closer dealA February 2025 report by Frontier Economics, commissioned by the pro-EU campaign Best for Britain.It modelled deep alignment in both goods and services, which is not what is on offer. The 2.2% is a long-run figure stretched from a one-year gain of 0.3% to 0.4%.
"8% of GDP"A US National Bureau of Economic Research paper, November 2025, comparing the UK with groups of other countries.It cannot separate Brexit from anything else. The US was lifted by cheap energy, heavy government spending and the AI boom. Italy, Spain and Greece were catching up after the euro crisis. Against France or Germany the gap is far smaller.
"6% of GDP"The same paper, using a Bank of England survey of firms.It treats every difference between firms that sold to the EU and firms that did not as the result of Brexit. Those firms were also exposed to Germany's weak economy and to high UK energy costs.

This table summarises an explainer by Britain Unbound (3 May 2026). We checked the headline figures against the original sources: the OBR's Brexit analysis, the NBER paper (which gives a range of 6% to 8%), Bloomberg and Best for Britain. The count of nine studies in 13 is Britain Unbound's. In fairness, most economists think leaving has had some cost. The point is that these figures are estimates built on assumptions, and they cannot all be right. Sources

Know someone who thinks Brexit failed?

Send them the facts. Every figure on this page links to its source.